Ad is loading...
GSBD
Price
$12.73
Change
-$0.04 (-0.31%)
Updated
Nov 18, 01:04 PM (EDT)
94 days until earnings call
SVVC
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSBD vs SVVC

Header iconGSBD vs SVVC Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs SVVCBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$12.73
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$82.95K
CapitalizationN/A
GSBD vs SVVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. SVVC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Sell and SVVC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GSBD: $12.77 vs. SVVC: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and SVVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 110% vs. SVVC: 1247%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.64B vs. SVVC: $1.62M
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.64B. SVVC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVVC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than SVVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while SVVC (@Investment Managers) price change was +33.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.29% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.64B) has a higher market cap than SVVC($1.62M). GSBD has higher P/E ratio than SVVC: GSBD (8.29) vs SVVC (7.32). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: -4.560 vs. SVVC (-77.333). SVVC has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. GSBD (76.6M). GSBD has higher revenues than SVVC: GSBD (208M) vs SVVC (-39.18M).
GSBDSVVCGSBD / SVVC
Capitalization1.64B1.62M101,420%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.560-77.3336%
P/E Ratio8.297.32113%
Revenue208M-39.18M-531%
Total Cash76.6M165M46%
Total Debt1.83BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs SVVC: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
SVVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
1698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVVC (53). This means that GSBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVC (100). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (98). This means that GSBD’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

SVVC's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (73). This means that SVVC’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVC (46). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EICIX18.770.04
+0.21%
EIC Value Institutional
GQGRX17.08-0.06
-0.35%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity R6
HNIDX12.61-0.06
-0.47%
Harbor Diversified Intl All Cp Retire
PRDMX49.87-0.52
-1.03%
T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Gr
LYFCX12.76-0.29
-2.22%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare C

SVVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVC and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVC and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVC
1D Price
Change %
SVVC100%
+10.57%
HRZN - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NXDT - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
BN - SVVC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
GSBD - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SLRC - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More