Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBFX vs HBLSX
GSBFX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts GSBFX vs HBLSX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder A
Price$26.64
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.52B
GSBFX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBFX vs. HBLSX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBFX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. GSBFX (2.63B). GSBFX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: GSBFX (4.03) vs HBLSX (3.19). GSBFX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: GSBFX (31 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). GSBFX (0.96) and HBLSX (0.96) have similar cost to investors . HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBFX (30.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBFX: HBLSX (0) vs GSBFX (1000). GSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.40 vs. HBLSX (2.02). GSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.99 vs. HBLSX (11.65).
| GSBFX | HBLSX | GSBFX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.96 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.973 | 7.878 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 11.5B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 3.19 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | 2.02 | 317% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 14.52 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.99 | 11.65 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.78 | 41.98 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement