Ad is loading...
GSCLX vs RGABX
GSCLX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGABX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$26.93
Change+$0.24 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
GSCLX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. GSCLX (1.36B). GSCLX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GSCLX (28 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GSCLX (1.09). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: GSCLX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. GSCLX (-3.38). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. GSCLX (-15.31).
| GSCLX | RGABX | GSCLX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.39 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.490 | -2.695 | 352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.38 | 1.96 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 29.21 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.31 | 36.12 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.01 | 48.37 | 37% |