Ad is loading...
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$15.61
Change+$0.31 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets780.91M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. GSCZX (781M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.39) vs GSCZX (0.22). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. GSCZX (-8.47). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. GSCZX (30.60).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.364 | -12.247 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 781M | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.39 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.47 | -2.36 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.59 | 4.67 | -227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.60 | 71.57 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.83 | 78.60 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers