Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.65
Change-$0.11 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.56M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. GSCZX (899M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.25) vs GSCZX (0.21). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. GSCZX (0.49). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.12 vs. GSCZX (17.61).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.566 | 2.876 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 899M | 154B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.25 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 9.55 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.20 | 20.84 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.61 | 58.12 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.96 | 113.38 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement