Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets909.43M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. GSCZX (909M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.20) vs GSCZX (0.20). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. GSCZX (3.79). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.43 vs. GSCZX (23.87).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.341 | 5.746 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 909M | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 12.82 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 38.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.87 | 65.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.17 | 130.73 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement