Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$16.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.08M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$108.59
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. GSCZX (816M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.43) vs GSCZX (0.23). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.75 vs. GSCZX (-5.48). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.31 vs. GSCZX (24.89).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.814 | -5.554 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 816M | 140B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.43 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.48 | 1.75 | -314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.61 | 22.26 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.89 | 67.31 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.56 | 90.72 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement