GSFD
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
HERB
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSFD vs HERB

Header iconGSFD vs HERB Comparison
Open Charts GSFD vs HERBBanner chart's image
Global Seafood Technologies
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization1.6M
YaSheng Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.87M
GSFD vs HERB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSFD vs. HERB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFD is a Hold and HERB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GSFD: $0.09 vs. HERB: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GSFD and HERB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSFD: 187% vs. HERB: 1%
Market capitalization -- GSFD: $1.6M vs. HERB: $4.87M
GSFD [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.6M. HERB’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $4.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHERB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HERB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSFD and HERB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSFD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HERB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HERB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSFD is a better buy in the short-term than HERB.

Price Growth

GSFD (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while HERB (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.91% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HERB($4.87M) has a higher market cap than GSFD($1.6M). GSFD YTD gains are higher at: -13.596 vs. HERB (-64.773).
GSFDHERBGSFD / HERB
Capitalization1.6M4.87M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.596-64.77321%
P/E RatioN/A0.08-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSFD vs HERB: Fundamental Ratings
GSFD
HERB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSFD's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (59). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's Price Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (96). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSFDHERB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFH6.500.82
+14.44%
Mercurity Fintech Holding
SNAP7.100.11
+1.57%
Snap
CATO3.930.03
+0.77%
CATO Corp
TOVX0.41-0.01
-1.29%
Theriva Biologics Inc
FINV8.35-0.21
-2.45%
FinVolution Group

GSFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSFD and CTUNF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSFD and CTUNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSFD
1D Price
Change %
GSFD100%
N/A
CTUNF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDESY - GSFD
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GSFD
-1%
Poorly correlated
+14.81%
GRGSF - GSFD
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HERB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HERB and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERB and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HERB
1D Price
Change %
HERB100%
+14.81%
GRCLF - HERB
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDESY - HERB
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - HERB
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - HERB
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSFD - HERB
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More