Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs KNGAX
GSFPX vs KNGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. KNGAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and KNGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. KNGAX (46.2M). KNGAX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: KNGAX (1.45) vs GSFPX (1.11). GSFPX was incepted earlier than KNGAX: GSFPX (8 years) vs KNGAX (8 years). KNGAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). KNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 536.68 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than KNGAX: GSFPX (0) vs KNGAX (1000). GSFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. KNGAX (-10.60). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.28 vs. KNGAX (-0.28).
| GSFPX | KNGAX | GSFPX / KNGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.20 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.53 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.009 | -3.074 | -358% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 46.2M | 7,983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | -10.60 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | -10.50 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | -0.28 | -13,539% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers