Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCAYX
GSFPX vs SCAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCAYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. SCAYX (203M). SCAYX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCAYX (5.98) vs GSFPX (1.11). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCAYX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SCAYX (17 years). SCAYX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCAYX: GSFPX (0) vs SCAYX (1000). SCAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. GSFPX (5.64). SCAYX return over 5 years is better than : 56.54 vs. GSFPX (38.28).
| GSFPX | SCAYX | GSFPX / SCAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.88 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.009 | 12.355 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 203M | 1,817% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 5.98 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 11.59 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 53.87 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | 56.54 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers