Ad is loading...
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.58B vs. SCCUX (192M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.56) vs GSFPX (1.34). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCCUX (19 years). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GSFPX (30.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.30 vs. GSFPX (16.97). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.55 vs. SCCUX (22.21).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.589 | 1.828 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 192M | 1,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 5.56 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.97 | 18.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 22.54 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.55 | 22.21 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers