Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a StrongBuy and SCCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. SCCUX (202M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.26) vs GSFPX (1.15). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCCUX (19 years). SCCUX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. GSFPX (9.06). SCCUX return over 5 years is better than : 52.41 vs. GSFPX (45.79).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.830 | 11.599 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 202M | 1,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 5.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.06 | 14.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.86 | 52.97 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.79 | 52.41 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers