Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a StrongBuy and SCCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.71B vs. SCCUX (206M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.13) vs GSFPX (1.13). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCCUX (20 years). SCCUX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. GSFPX (9.11). SCCUX return over 5 years is better than : 50.21 vs. GSFPX (43.86).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.009 | 12.726 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 206M | 1,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 5.13 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 14.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.53 | 62.44 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.86 | 50.21 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement