Ad is loading...
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. SCCUX (190M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.50) vs GSFPX (1.20). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCCUX (19 years). SCCUX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.75). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (30.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.83 vs. GSFPX (7.99). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. SCCUX (32.71).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.942 | 0.697 | -135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 190M | 1,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 5.50 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 10.83 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.45 | 29.72 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.90 | 32.71 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...