Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.66B vs. SCCUX (202M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.05) vs GSFPX (1.11). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SCCUX (20 years). SCCUX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. GSFPX (4.61). SCCUX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. GSFPX (37.89).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.237 | 11.779 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 202M | 1,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 5.05 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 10.69 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.49 | 49.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.89 | 49.86 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers