Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCNUX
GSFPX vs SCNUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCNUX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a StrongBuy and SCNUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.64B vs. SCNUX (200M). SCNUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCNUX (5.98) vs GSFPX (1.15). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCNUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCNUX (17 years). SCNUX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCNUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCNUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCNUX (1000). SCNUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.38 vs. GSFPX (9.91). SCNUX return over 5 years is better than : 53.11 vs. GSFPX (41.60).
| GSFPX | SCNUX | GSFPX / SCNUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.13 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.15 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.171 | 10.773 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 200M | 1,821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 5.98 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.91 | 16.38 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 53.37 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.60 | 53.11 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement