Ad is loading...
GSFPX vs SCNUX
GSFPX vs SCNUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCNUX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCNUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.58B vs. SCNUX (192M). SCNUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCNUX (6.25) vs GSFPX (1.34). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCNUX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCNUX (17 years). SCNUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GSFPX (30.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCNUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCNUX (1000). SCNUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.23 vs. GSFPX (16.97). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.55 vs. SCNUX (26.20).
| GSFPX | SCNUX | GSFPX / SCNUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.589 | 1.952 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 192M | 1,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 6.25 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.97 | 19.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 25.45 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.55 | 26.20 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...