Ad is loading...
GSFTX vs RMFCX
GSFTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSFTX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
Price$33.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.97B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
GSFTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFTX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GSFTX (41B). GSFTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GSFTX (1.76) vs RMFCX (1.37). GSFTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSFTX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSFTX (0.65). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GSFTX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSFTX: RMFCX (250) vs GSFTX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. GSFTX (4.46). GSFTX return over 5 years is better than : 66.91 vs. RMFCX (56.16).
| GSFTX | RMFCX | GSFTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.554 | 1.270 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 101B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.37 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 5.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.69 | 17.29 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.91 | 56.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.57 | 60.33 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...