Ad is loading...
GSGCX vs RMFCX
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C
Price$40.66
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. GSGCX (374M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GSGCX (0.63). GSGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGCX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGCX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. GSGCX (-4.95). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. GSGCX (31.90).
| GSGCX | RMFCX | GSGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.646 | -2.681 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 97.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.95 | 1.87 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.66 | 6.27 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.90 | 53.32 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.67 | 54.78 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...