Ad is loading...
GSGCX vs RMFCX
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C
Price$42.58
Change-$0.59 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.2M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.91
Change-$0.30 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. GSGCX (400M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGCX: RMFCX (1.30) vs GSGCX (0.75). GSGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGCX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGCX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. GSGCX (1.25). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 77.01 vs. GSGCX (57.32).
| GSGCX | RMFCX | GSGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.172 | 1.136 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 400M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.30 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.25 | 5.61 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.16 | 15.62 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.32 | 77.01 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.46 | 64.83 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers