Ad is loading...
GSGCX vs RMFCX
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C
Price$42.11
Change-$0.30 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.16M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.84
Change-$0.38 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.3B
GSGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GSGCX (388M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGCX: RMFCX (1.37) vs GSGCX (0.64). GSGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGCX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGCX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. GSGCX (-0.74). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.59 vs. GSGCX (39.76).
| GSGCX | RMFCX | GSGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.542 | 0.774 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.37 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.74 | 5.45 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.62 | 14.23 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.76 | 57.59 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.11 | 58.86 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...