Ad is loading...
GSGPX vs NABCX
GSGPX vs NABCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGPX vs. NABCX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGPX is a StrongBuy and NABCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. NABCX (59.5M). GSGPX pays higher dividends than NABCX: GSGPX (2.62) vs NABCX (0.00). GSGPX was incepted earlier than NABCX: GSGPX (7 years) vs NABCX (13 years). NABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. GSGPX (126.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NABCX: GSGPX (0) vs NABCX (1000). GSGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. NABCX (4.30). NABCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.04 vs. GSGPX (13.81).
| GSGPX | NABCX | GSGPX / NABCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.012 | 1.619 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 59.5M | 8,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 4.30 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.71 | 11.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.81 | 15.04 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...