Ad is loading...
GSGPX vs SMUYX
GSGPX vs SMUYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGPX vs. SMUYX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGPX is a Hold and SMUYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.57B vs. SMUYX (234M). SMUYX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: SMUYX (5.90) vs GSGPX (1.14). GSGPX was incepted earlier than SMUYX: GSGPX (7 years) vs SMUYX (10 years). SMUYX (3.47) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.86). SMUYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 277.00 vs. GSGPX (126.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMUYX: GSGPX (0) vs SMUYX (100000). SMUYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.39 vs. GSGPX (0.73). GSGPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.95 vs. SMUYX (16.92).
| GSGPX | SMUYX | GSGPX / SMUYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 3.47 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 3.47 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.708 | -2.963 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 234M | 1,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 5.90 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | 1.39 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.22 | 6.85 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.95 | 16.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |