Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGPX vs SMUYX
GSGPX vs SMUYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGPX vs. SMUYX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGPX is a Hold and SMUYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.81B vs. SMUYX (242M). SMUYX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: SMUYX (5.75) vs GSGPX (1.13). GSGPX was incepted earlier than SMUYX: GSGPX (7 years) vs SMUYX (10 years). SMUYX (3.47) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.82). SMUYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 277.00 vs. GSGPX (179.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMUYX: GSGPX (0) vs SMUYX (100000). SMUYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. GSGPX (4.85). GSGPX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. SMUYX (17.36).
| GSGPX | SMUYX | GSGPX / SMUYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.09 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.47 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.106 | 2.857 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 242M | 1,988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 5.75 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 7.25 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.29 | 19.91 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 17.36 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement