GSISF
Price
$2.69
Change
-$0.34 (-11.22%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
WHGOF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
69.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs WHGOF

Header iconGSISF vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$2.69
Change-$0.34 (-11.22%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.92B
White Gold
Price$0.35
Change+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Volume$349.12K
Capitalization69.09M
GSISF vs WHGOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. WHGOF commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and WHGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $2.69 vs. WHGOF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 47% vs. WHGOF: 330%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $2.92B vs. WHGOF: $69.09M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.92B. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $69.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $77.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGOF is a better buy in the long-term than GSISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGOF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.06% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4558.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.05% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($2.93B) has a higher market cap than WHGOF($69.1M). WHGOF YTD gains are higher at: 117.146 vs. GSISF (61.377). GSISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. WHGOF (-2.47M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. WHGOF (3.53M). GSISF has higher revenues than WHGOF: GSISF (439M) vs WHGOF (0).
GSISFWHGOFGSISF / WHGOF
Capitalization2.93B69.1M4,233%
EBITDA119M-2.47M-4,813%
Gain YTD61.377117.14652%
P/E Ratio21.39N/A-
Revenue439M0-
Total Cash171M3.53M4,848%
Total Debt45.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFWHGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FINMF57.002.85
+5.26%
Leonardo S.P.A.
NRKBF87.75N/A
N/A
NKT A/S
SPSTF0.51N/A
N/A
Singapore Post, Ltd.
ASCBF11.99N/A
N/A
A SPAC II Acquisition Corp.
LSEB0.35N/A
N/A
LSEB CREATIVE CORP.

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with DTARF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then DTARF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
-11.06%
DTARF - GSISF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
STBMF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGOF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
MAIFF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
PMCOF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
+1.36%
GSISF - WHGOF
30%
Poorly correlated
-11.06%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
AU - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
TORXF - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
HMY - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More