Advertisement
GSL vs NMM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) vs. Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) maintains a high charter coverage of 96% through 2026, supporting revenue stability in the containership segment.
- Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) recently increased its quarterly distribution by 20% to $0.06 per unit, reflecting improved cash flow generation across its diversified fleet.
- GSL trades with a higher dividend yield near 6% and stronger net margins compared to NMM’s lower payout and broader exposure to dry bulk and tanker markets.
- Both stocks have delivered strong one-year returns, with NMM showing higher year-to-date gains amid sector tailwinds in marine shipping.
- Recent earnings announcements and upcoming reports for both companies underscore ongoing focus on fleet expansion and contract visibility.
- Market sentiment remains constructive for shipping equities, driven by elevated charter rates and disciplined capital allocation.
Introduction
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) operate in the marine shipping industry, providing investors exposure to global trade flows through containership and diversified vessel fleets. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance metrics, and positioning within a sector influenced by charter rates, supply-demand dynamics, and macroeconomic conditions. Professional traders and long-term investors evaluating relative value in shipping equities may find this analysis useful for assessing risk-adjusted opportunities and portfolio diversification strategies.
GSL Overview and Recent Performance
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) owns and charters containerships under multi-year contracts to major liner companies. The company has secured 96% revenue coverage through 2026 at elevated charter rates, providing earnings visibility. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $40–41, supported by a quarterly dividend of $0.625 declared for the first quarter of 2026. Upcoming first-quarter 2026 earnings on May 22 offer further insight into operational results. Sentiment has been bolstered by consistent dividend payouts and fleet utilization amid resilient container trade volumes.
NMM Overview and Recent Performance
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) operates a diversified fleet of dry bulk vessels, containerships, and tankers, generating revenue through time charters across global trade routes. Recent weeks saw the company raise its quarterly distribution to $0.06 per unit, a 20% increase, following strong cash generation. The stock has hovered around $71–72, with notable year-to-date gains exceeding 36%. First-quarter 2026 results highlighted earnings beats and continued fleet optimization. Broader market activity reflects positive investor response to distribution growth and exposure to multiple shipping segments.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate dynamic market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers, yet only the highest-performing and most adaptable models earn placement in the Trending section. These bots feature varied trading styles, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, with many demonstrating win rates above 60% and annualized returns in the 20–50% range in backtested environments. Investors seeking data-driven signals can explore live performance metrics and strategy details directly on the platform.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) focuses exclusively on containership charters with long-term contracts, while Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) maintains a broader fleet mix including dry bulk and tankers, offering greater sector diversification but also higher exposure to commodity price volatility. GSL delivers superior net margins above 50% and a higher dividend yield near 6%, whereas NMM emphasizes distribution growth and reports solid earnings surprises. Recent momentum favors both, yet GSL exhibits lower beta and more predictable revenue streams. Risk factors for GSL center on container rate cycles, while NMM faces potential headwinds from dry bulk oversupply. Overall market sentiment supports both names amid elevated global trade activity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modest edge to Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) based on its consistent trend stability, high charter backlog, and superior margin profile relative to Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). The probabilistic assessment reflects stronger earnings visibility and dividend sustainability, though NMM’s diversified operations and recent distribution increase provide meaningful counterbalance. Continued monitoring of upcoming earnings and charter renewals will refine this positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSL is a Hold and NMM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNMM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GSL (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.05% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
GSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
NMM is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+0.13% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| GSL | NMM | GSL / NMM | |
| Capitalization | 1.37B | 2.06B | 67% |
| EBITDA | 548M | 818M | 67% |
| Gain YTD | 12.224 | 38.448 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.66 | 6.06 | 60% |
| Revenue | 757M | 1.4B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 499M | 421M | 119% |
| Total Debt | 653M | 1.62B | 40% |
GSL | NMM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSL's Valuation (7) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMM (51) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMM’s over the last 12 months.
GSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NMM (37) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
GSL's SMR Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NMM (43) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GSL (48) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to GSL’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GSL (19) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to GSL’s over the last 12 months.
| GSL | NMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PARWX | 64.80 | 0.46 | +0.71% |
| Parnassus Value Equity Investor | |||
| NEJCX | 6.28 | -0.02 | -0.32% |
| Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap C | |||
| BIIGX | 37.14 | -0.12 | -0.32% |
| Buffalo Growth Institutional | |||
| LCORX | 23.77 | -0.08 | -0.34% |
| Leuthold Core Investment Retail | |||
| GFAFX | 85.88 | -0.84 | -0.97% |
| American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1 | |||
GSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSL has been closely correlated with CMRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSL jumps, then CMRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSL | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| CMRE - GSL | 71% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| DAC - GSL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NMM - GSL | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| GNK - GSL | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| SBLK - GSL | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | 100% | +2.01% | ||
| GNK - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| GSL - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| HAFN - NMM | 61% Loosely correlated | +7.01% | ||
| DAC - NMM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| CMRE - NMM | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||