Ad is loading...
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$14.75
Change+$0.21 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.4M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GSLAX (393M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GSLAX (1.07). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. GSLAX (-9.99). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. GSLAX (22.65).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.916 | -2.681 | 295% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | 1.87 | -533% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | 6.27 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 53.32 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.80 | 54.78 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...