Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets421.48M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GSLAX (421M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.21) vs GSLAX (0.99). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. GSLAX (-7.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. GSLAX (16.36).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.320 | 12.783 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 421M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.88 | 6.00 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 27.94 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.36 | 52.67 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.84 | 84.73 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers