Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.43M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSLAX (433M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GSLAX (1.01). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. GSLAX (-3.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. GSLAX (26.66).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.333 | 12.804 | 49% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 6.75 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 33.93 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 58.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.10 | 96.04 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers