Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.37
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.6M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.29
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GSLAX (431M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GSLAX (1.03). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. GSLAX (-3.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.75 vs. GSLAX (27.30).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.230 | 9.283 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.41 | 7.82 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.56 | 30.38 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.30 | 56.75 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.61 | 75.64 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers