Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLCX vs PFRRX
GSLCX vs PFRRX Comparison
Open Charts GSLCX vs PFRRX
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fxd Inc C
Price$11.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.01M
PIMCO International Bond (USD-Hdg) R
Price$10.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.15B
GSLCX vs PFRRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLCX vs. PFRRX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLCX is a Hold and PFRRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFRRX has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. GSLCX (864M). GSLCX pays higher dividends than PFRRX: GSLCX (4.00) vs PFRRX (3.77). GSLCX was incepted earlier than PFRRX: GSLCX (28 years) vs PFRRX (23 years). GSLCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PFRRX (1.22). PFRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 699.00 vs. GSLCX (540.00). PFRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLCX: PFRRX (0) vs GSLCX (1000). PFRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. GSLCX (4.16). PFRRX return over 5 years is better than : 2.74 vs. GSLCX (-6.20).
| GSLCX | PFRRX | GSLCX / PFRRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.22 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.306 | 3.675 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 16.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.77 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 4.71 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 17.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.20 | 2.74 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | 23.87 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement