Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLCX vs TNBMX
GSLCX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts GSLCX vs TNBMX
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fxd Inc C
Price$11.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.01M
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
GSLCX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLCX vs. TNBMX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLCX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. GSLCX (864M). GSLCX pays higher dividends than TNBMX: GSLCX (4.00) vs TNBMX (3.45). GSLCX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: GSLCX (28 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). GSLCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). GSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 540.00 vs. TNBMX (54.50). GSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: GSLCX (1000) vs TNBMX (500000). TNBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. GSLCX (4.16). TNBMX return over 5 years is better than : -5.38 vs. GSLCX (-6.20).
| GSLCX | TNBMX | GSLCX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.53 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.53 | 351% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.306 | 3.771 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 7.33B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.45 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 4.74 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 11.92 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.20 | -5.38 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement