Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLCX vs VTABX
GSLCX vs VTABX Comparison
Open Charts GSLCX vs VTABX
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fxd Inc C
Price$11.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets811.37M
Vanguard Total Intl Bd Idx Admiral™
Price$19.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.82B
GSLCX vs VTABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLCX vs. VTABX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLCX is a Hold and VTABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTABX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. GSLCX (811M). VTABX (4.31) and GSLCX (4.10) have matching dividends . GSLCX was incepted earlier than VTABX: GSLCX (28 years) vs VTABX (12 years). GSLCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than VTABX (0.10). GSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 540.00 vs. VTABX (26.00). GSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTABX: GSLCX (1000) vs VTABX (3000). VTABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. GSLCX (1.95). VTABX return over 5 years is better than : -1.77 vs. GSLCX (-8.01).
| GSLCX | VTABX | GSLCX / VTABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.10 | 1,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.10 | 1,860% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.396 | 1.835 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 811M | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.10 | 4.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 3.17 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 10.25 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.01 | -1.77 | 452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.88 | 21.77 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement