Ad is loading...
GSMGX vs PMBPX
GSMGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts GSMGX vs PMBPX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$13.00
Change-$0.09 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
GSMGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMGX vs. PMBPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMGX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.4B vs. GSMGX (1.46B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs GSMGX (0.00). GSMGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: GSMGX (20 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). GSMGX (2.03) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: PMBPX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. GSMGX (-9.53). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.77 vs. GSMGX (-14.64).
| GSMGX | PMBPX | GSMGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.83 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.83 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.776 | 1.680 | -642% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 30.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | 8.61 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.54 | 41.65 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.64 | 65.77 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.99 | 92.95 | -35% |