Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSMTX vs NMBAX
GSMTX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts GSMTX vs NMBAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Inc Inst
Price$15.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.58B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.37B
GSMTX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMTX vs. NMBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMTX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSMTX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. NMBAX (8.37B). GSMTX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: GSMTX (3.75) vs NMBAX (3.08). GSMTX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: GSMTX (28 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX (0.64) is less costly to investors than GSMTX (0.41). GSMTX (27.00) and NMBAX (27.00) have comparable annual turnover. NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMTX: NMBAX (2500) vs GSMTX (1000000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.65 vs. GSMTX (2.92). GSMTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.46 vs. NMBAX (5.51).
| GSMTX | NMBAX | GSMTX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.64 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.966 | 4.066 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 8.37B | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 3.08 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 3.65 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.25 | 12.95 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.46 | 5.51 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.60 | 18.02 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement