Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWEBX
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$14.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. GSPCX (1.37B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GSPCX (0.49). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWEBX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. GSPCX (-11.39). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.48 vs. GSPCX (1.92).
| GSPCX | RWEBX | GSPCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.06 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.06 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.840 | 5.319 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.39 | 7.02 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.60 | 29.59 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.92 | 52.48 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.96 | 65.56 | -46% |