Ad is loading...
GSPCX vs RWEBX
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core C
Price$12.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$58.73
Change+$1.02 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.84B
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 176B vs. GSPCX (1.18B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GSPCX (0.53). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWEBX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. GSPCX (-23.04). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.43 vs. GSPCX (-3.32).
| GSPCX | RWEBX | GSPCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.06 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.06 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.078 | -3.772 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 176B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.83 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.04 | -2.39 | 965% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.36 | 3.51 | -580% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.32 | 50.43 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.45 | 47.46 | -89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...