Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWEBX
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$13.65
Change-$0.19 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$61.59
Change-$0.63 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.44B
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. GSPCX (1.31B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GSPCX (0.51). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWEBX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.84 vs. GSPCX (-14.41). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. GSPCX (0.04).
| GSPCX | RWEBX | GSPCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.06 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.06 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.487 | 1.116 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 194B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.80 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.41 | 3.84 | -375% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.59 | 22.59 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.04 | 47.99 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.20 | 56.01 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement