Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPPX vs RGACX
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSPPX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P
Price$12.27
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPPX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GSPPX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSPPX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSPPX (0.00). GSPPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSPPX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSPPX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . GSPPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSPPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSPPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GSPPX (-11.79). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. GSPPX (-4.73).
| GSPPX | RGACX | GSPPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.705 | 15.460 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.79 | 6.37 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.36 | 61.11 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.73 | 32.00 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement