Ad is loading...
GSPRX vs RWEBX
GSPRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core R
Price$27.17
Change+$2.41 (+9.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.38
Change+$4.26 (+7.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.99B
GSPRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. GSPRX (1.11B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPRX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GSPRX (0.21). GSPRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPRX (17 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). GSPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GSPRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.93 vs. GSPRX (-15.74). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.18 vs. GSPRX (28.04).
| GSPRX | RWEBX | GSPRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.06 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.577 | -9.687 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 168B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.74 | -8.93 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | -4.32 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.04 | 41.18 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.89 | 38.06 | -5% |