Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPRX vs RWMFX
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R
Price$31.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.45
Change+$0.25 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.69B
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GSPRX (1.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPRX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GSPRX (0.19). GSPRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPRX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSPRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. GSPRX (-1.82). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.14 vs. GSPRX (35.61).
| GSPRX | RWMFX | GSPRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.31 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.31 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.422 | 5.559 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 201B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.48 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 4.71 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.85 | 32.47 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 52.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.04 | 66.80 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement