Ad is loading...
GSRTX vs NABCX
GSRTX vs NABCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSRTX vs. NABCX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSRTX is a StrongBuy and NABCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSRTX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. NABCX (59.5M). GSRTX pays higher dividends than NABCX: GSRTX (2.59) vs NABCX (0.00). GSRTX was incepted earlier than NABCX: GSRTX (17 years) vs NABCX (13 years). NABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. GSRTX (126.00). GSRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NABCX: GSRTX (0) vs NABCX (1000). GSRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. NABCX (4.30). NABCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.04 vs. GSRTX (12.98).
| GSRTX | NABCX | GSRTX / NABCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.971 | 1.619 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 59.5M | 8,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 4.30 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.14 | 11.91 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.98 | 15.04 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.85 | 12.77 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...