Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSTRX vs RGACX
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSTRX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R
Price$7.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSTRX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSTRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. GSTRX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSTRX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSTRX (0.00). GSTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSTRX (17 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSTRX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSTRX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. GSTRX (-22.41). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. GSTRX (-28.39).
| GSTRX | RGACX | GSTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.94 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.94 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.565 | 14.863 | -125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.41 | 6.60 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 60.28 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.39 | 30.90 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.77 | 84.84 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement