Ad is loading...
GSTRX vs RGACX
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSTRX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R
Price$8.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSTRX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSTRX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. GSTRX (178M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSTRX: RGACX (0.08) vs GSTRX (0.00). GSTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSTRX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSTRX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSTRX (0) vs RGACX (250). GSTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. RGACX (2.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. GSTRX (7.40).
| GSTRX | RGACX | GSTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.94 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.94 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.646 | -2.667 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 2.58 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.90 | 31.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.40 | 41.87 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.38 | 58.36 | -47% |