Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSTRX vs RGACX
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSTRX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R
Price$11.18
Change+$0.12 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.37M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
GSTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSTRX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSTRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. GSTRX (196M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSTRX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSTRX (0.00). GSTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSTRX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSTRX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSTRX (0) vs RGACX (250). GSTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. RGACX (14.19). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. GSTRX (4.14).
| GSTRX | RGACX | GSTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.94 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.94 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 19.586 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | 14.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.37 | 74.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.14 | 40.04 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.50 | 101.32 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers