GT
Price
$9.13
Change
+$0.19 (+2.13%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.9B
30 days until earnings call
MBLY
Price
$14.96
Change
+$0.48 (+3.31%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.88B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GT vs MBLY

Header iconGT vs MBLY Comparison
Open Charts GT vs MBLYBanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.13
Change+$0.19 (+2.13%)
Volume$146.79K
Capitalization3.9B
Mobileye Global
Price$14.96
Change+$0.48 (+3.31%)
Volume$25.43K
Capitalization25.88B
GT vs MBLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. MBLY commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and MBLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $8.94 vs. MBLY: $14.49)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. MBLY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 105% vs. MBLY: 104%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. MBLY: $25.88B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. MBLY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $25.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBLY is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.28% price change this week, while MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -12.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($25.9B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT YTD gains are higher at: -0.667 vs. MBLY (-27.259). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 856M vs. MBLY (529M). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. GT (902M). MBLY has less debt than GT: MBLY (3.52B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than MBLY: GT (20.1B) vs MBLY (2.08B).
GTMBLYGT / MBLY
Capitalization3.9B25.9B15%
EBITDA856M529M162%
Gain YTD-0.667-27.2592%
P/E Ratio769.23N/A-
Revenue20.1B2.08B967%
Total Cash902M1.21B74%
Total Debt8.65B3.52B246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT: Fundamental Ratings
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTES65.350.75
+1.16%
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
FSCO7.100.05
+0.71%
FS Credit Opportunities Corp
HEQ10.440.04
+0.38%
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
SAT24.420.02
+0.08%
Saratoga Investment Corp
DIVS29.13-0.07
-0.25%
SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with GT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then GT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
+0.66%
GT - MBLY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
MGA - MBLY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
BWA - MBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
ALV - MBLY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
AXL - MBLY
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
More