GT
Price
$10.09
Change
-$0.19 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
88 days until earnings call
VSAT
Price
$16.58
Change
+$1.06 (+6.83%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.27B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs VSAT

Header iconGT vs VSAT Comparison
Open Charts GT vs VSATBanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$10.09
Change-$0.19 (-1.85%)
Volume$5.24M
Capitalization3.9B
ViaSat
Price$16.58
Change+$1.06 (+6.83%)
Volume$4.51M
Capitalization2.27B
GT vs VSAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VSAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. VSAT commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Buy and VSAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $10.09 vs. VSAT: $16.44)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. VSAT: Not notable
GT represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while VSAT is part of the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 83% vs. VSAT: 153%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. VSAT: $2.27B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. VSAT’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVSAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VSAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VSAT is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VSAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VSAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VSAT is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.52% price change this week, while VSAT (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +13.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

VSAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-3.68% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Telecommunications Equipment (-3.59% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GT($3.9B) has a higher market cap than VSAT($2.27B). GT has higher P/E ratio than VSAT: GT (769.23) vs VSAT (136.99). VSAT YTD gains are higher at: 94.830 vs. GT (12.111). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 856M vs. VSAT (93.7M). VSAT has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. GT (902M). VSAT has less debt than GT: VSAT (7.74B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than VSAT: GT (20.1B) vs VSAT (3.8B).
GTVSATGT / VSAT
Capitalization3.9B2.27B172%
EBITDA856M93.7M914%
Gain YTD12.11194.83013%
P/E Ratio769.23136.99562%
Revenue20.1B3.8B529%
Total Cash902M1.65B55%
Total Debt8.65B7.74B112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs VSAT: Fundamental Ratings
GT
VSAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6416
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
8292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GT's Valuation (57) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as VSAT (82) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to VSAT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as VSAT (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to VSAT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's SMR Rating (82) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as VSAT (92) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to VSAT’s over the last 12 months.

VSAT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as GT (59) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that VSAT’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as VSAT (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to VSAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTVSAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VSAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDIVX49.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Diversified International
SLAPX28.37N/A
N/A
DWS Latin America Equity C
LMOIX41.37N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth IS
NWXPX9.95N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Index Instl Svc
USLUX20.44-0.21
-1.02%
US Global Investors Global Luxury Goods

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.85%
AXL - GT
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
BWA - GT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
VC - GT
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
LIMAF - GT
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
LEA - GT
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
More