Ad is loading...
GTAPX vs NLSAX
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSAX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.75M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.55
Change+$0.18 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. GTAPX (43.7M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GTAPX (2.31) vs NLSAX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSAX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSAX (1000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. GTAPX (-0.60). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.03 vs. NLSAX (28.55).
| GTAPX | NLSAX | GTAPX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.68 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.68 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.330 | -0.488 | -68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.60 | 5.03 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.82 | 10.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.03 | 28.55 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.10 | 37.73 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...