Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSAX
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSAX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$14.29
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.33M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSAX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. GTAPX (45.3M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GTAPX (1.57) vs NLSAX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSAX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSAX (1000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. GTAPX (2.67). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.76 vs. NLSAX (22.56).
| GTAPX | NLSAX | GTAPX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.68 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.68 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.489 | 6.392 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 7.81B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 8.09 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.08 | 23.63 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.76 | 22.56 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.67 | 55.15 | 66% |