GTBIF
Price
$5.52
Change
-$0.18 (-3.16%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
TSNDF
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.04 (-9.52%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
392.5M
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTBIF vs TSNDF

Header iconGTBIF vs TSNDF Comparison
Open Charts GTBIF vs TSNDFBanner chart's image
Green Thumb Industries
Price$5.52
Change-$0.18 (-3.16%)
Volume$175.5K
Capitalization1.68B
TerrAscend
Price$0.38
Change-$0.04 (-9.52%)
Volume$331.46K
Capitalization392.5M
GTBIF vs TSNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTBIF vs. TSNDF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTBIF is a Hold and TSNDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GTBIF: $5.52 vs. TSNDF: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: GTBIF and TSNDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTBIF: 44% vs. TSNDF: 37%
Market capitalization -- GTBIF: $1.68B vs. TSNDF: $392.5M
GTBIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $1.68B. TSNDF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $392.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTBIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSNDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSNDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSNDF is a better buy in the long-term than GTBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTBIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSNDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TSNDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSNDF is a better buy in the short-term than GTBIF.

Price Growth

GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while TSNDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -4.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSNDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.10% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($1.68B) has a higher market cap than TSNDF($393M). GTBIF YTD gains are higher at: -32.436 vs. TSNDF (-41.538).
GTBIFTSNDFGTBIF / TSNDF
Capitalization1.68B393M428%
EBITDA253MN/A-
Gain YTD-32.436-41.53878%
P/E Ratio172.41N/A-
Revenue1.02BN/A-
Total Cash185MN/A-
Total Debt541MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTBIF vs TSNDF: Fundamental Ratings
GTBIF
TSNDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
746
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSNDF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (72). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (64). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTBIF (95). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTBIFTSNDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPM261.04-4.64
-1.75%
JPMorgan Chase & Co
ANDE34.41-1.21
-3.40%
Andersons
ORC6.90-0.26
-3.63%
Orchid Island Capital
SITE115.94-5.60
-4.61%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
PLBY1.47-0.10
-6.37%
PLBY Group

TSNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSNDF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSNDF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSNDF
1D Price
Change %
TSNDF100%
-8.46%
GTBIF - TSNDF
78%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
CRLBF - TSNDF
76%
Closely correlated
-5.57%
TCNNF - TSNDF
76%
Closely correlated
-4.10%
CURLF - TSNDF
74%
Closely correlated
-4.55%
VRNOF - TSNDF
74%
Closely correlated
-6.71%
More