GTBIF
Price
$8.63
Change
-$0.34 (-3.79%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
VRNOF
Price
$1.50
Change
+$0.03 (+2.04%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
539.23M
94 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTBIF vs VRNOF

Header iconGTBIF vs VRNOF Comparison
Open Charts GTBIF vs VRNOFBanner chart's image
Green Thumb Industries
Price$8.63
Change-$0.34 (-3.79%)
Volume$689.6K
Capitalization1.8B
Verano Holdings
Price$1.50
Change+$0.03 (+2.04%)
Volume$1.38M
Capitalization539.23M
GTBIF vs VRNOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTBIF vs. VRNOF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTBIF is a Hold and VRNOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GTBIF: $7.56 vs. VRNOF: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: GTBIF and VRNOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTBIF: 180% vs. VRNOF: 133%
Market capitalization -- GTBIF: $1.8B vs. VRNOF: $539.23M
GTBIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $1.8B. VRNOF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $539.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRNOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRNOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTBIF and VRNOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTBIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRNOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRNOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRNOF is a better buy in the short-term than GTBIF.

Price Growth

GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +6.03% price change this week, while VRNOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +26.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +78.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRNOF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+4.25% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($1.8B) has a higher market cap than VRNOF($539M). VRNOF YTD gains are higher at: -2.811 vs. GTBIF (-7.466). GTBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 368M vs. VRNOF (-100.4M). GTBIF has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. VRNOF (84.2M). GTBIF (526M) and VRNOF (529M) have identical debt. GTBIF has higher revenues than VRNOF: GTBIF (1.14B) vs VRNOF (867M).
GTBIFVRNOFGTBIF / VRNOF
Capitalization1.8B539M333%
EBITDA368M-100.4M-367%
Gain YTD-7.466-2.811266%
P/E Ratio68.73N/A-
Revenue1.14B867M132%
Total Cash211M84.2M251%
Total Debt526M529M99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTBIF: Fundamental Ratings
GTBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTBIFVRNOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRSCX12.02N/A
N/A
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq C
ITRIX26.58N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec I
SCUIX30.27N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
CSQCX9.61N/A
N/A
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
BMSRX14.88N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R1

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
-12.40%
TCNNF - GTBIF
83%
Closely correlated
-7.35%
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
-9.48%
VRNOF - GTBIF
80%
Closely correlated
-19.33%
TSNDF - GTBIF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More

VRNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRNOF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRNOF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRNOF
1D Price
Change %
VRNOF100%
-19.33%
GTBIF - VRNOF
79%
Closely correlated
-12.40%
CURLF - VRNOF
78%
Closely correlated
-9.48%
TCNNF - VRNOF
76%
Closely correlated
-7.35%
TSNDF - VRNOF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
CRLBF - VRNOF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More