Ad is loading...
GTCDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 28 closing price
LRAXF
Price
$0.99
Change
-$0.07 (-6.54%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GTCDF vs LRAXF

Header iconGTCDF vs LRAXF Comparison
Open Charts GTCDF vs LRAXFBanner chart's image
Getty Copper
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
CapitalizationN/A
Lara Exploration
Price$0.99
Change-$0.07 (-6.54%)
Volume$5.26K
CapitalizationN/A
GTCDF vs LRAXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTCDF vs. LRAXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTCDF is a Hold and LRAXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GTCDF: $0.05 vs. LRAXF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: GTCDF and LRAXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTCDF: 100% vs. LRAXF: 76%
Market capitalization -- GTCDF: $4.76M vs. LRAXF: $17.29M
GTCDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.76M. LRAXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTCDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRAXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTCDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRAXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTCDF and LRAXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GTCDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LRAXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRAXF($17.3M) has a higher market cap than GTCDF($4.76M). GTCDF YTD gains are higher at: 339.640 vs. LRAXF (180.361). GTCDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -193.02K vs. LRAXF (-2.68M). LRAXF has more cash in the bank: 2.96M vs. GTCDF (78.4K). GTCDF (0) and LRAXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GTCDFLRAXFGTCDF / LRAXF
Capitalization4.76M17.3M28%
EBITDA-193.02K-2.68M7%
Gain YTD339.640180.361188%
P/E RatioN/A12.42-
Revenue00-
Total Cash78.4K2.96M3%
Total Debt2.07MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTCDF vs LRAXF: Fundamental Ratings
GTCDF
LRAXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6443
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTCDF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRAXF (99). This means that GTCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRAXF’s over the last 12 months.

LRAXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GTCDF (64). This means that LRAXF’s stock grew similarly to GTCDF’s over the last 12 months.

GTCDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LRAXF (95). This means that GTCDF’s stock grew similarly to LRAXF’s over the last 12 months.

GTCDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LRAXF (35). This means that GTCDF’s stock grew similarly to LRAXF’s over the last 12 months.

LRAXF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTCDF (100). This means that LRAXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOSYX22.02-0.22
-0.99%
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val Y
MGGLX34.89-0.41
-1.16%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp L
WFSPX688.63-9.11
-1.31%
iShares S&P 500 Index K
LMTIX25.04-0.38
-1.49%
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity I
UOPSX75.14-3.79
-4.80%
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Svc

GTCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTCDF and FEOVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTCDF and FEOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTCDF
1D Price
Change %
GTCDF100%
N/A
FEOVF - GTCDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JZRIF - GTCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAUGF - GTCDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
LRAXF - GTCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.01%
KVGOF - GTCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LRAXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRAXF and DAUGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRAXF and DAUGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRAXF
1D Price
Change %
LRAXF100%
-7.01%
DAUGF - LRAXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
TTEXF - LRAXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - LRAXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVPMF - LRAXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUNMF - LRAXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More