Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWBX
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWBX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap C
Price$36.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. GTDCX (1.24B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDCX (0.18) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDCX (26 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWBX (12.87) and GTDCX (12.65) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. GTDCX (-1.78).
| GTDCX | RNWBX | GTDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.097 | 17.729 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 71.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.13 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.65 | 12.87 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 30.09 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.78 | 22.93 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.26 | 72.17 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement