Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWBX
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$38.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.21
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GTDDX (1.26B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDDX (1.04) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDDX (1.39). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). GTDDX (15.87) and RNWBX (15.81) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.01 vs. GTDDX (5.93).
| GTDDX | RNWBX | GTDDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.357 | 22.651 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 74.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.13 | 827% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | 15.81 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.67 | 46.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.93 | 27.01 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.42 | 89.65 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement