Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWBX
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWBX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap A
Price$36.87
Change-$0.18 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.18
Change-$0.22 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. GTDDX (1.25B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDDX (1.04) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDDX (1.39). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). GTDDX (14.37) and RNWBX (14.13) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 20.62 vs. GTDDX (1.45).
| GTDDX | RNWBX | GTDDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.164 | 15.812 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 70.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.13 | 803% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 14.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.23 | 27.48 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.45 | 20.62 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.57 | 68.11 | 76% |