GTES vs TTNDY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTES is a Hold and TTNDY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTNDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GTES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTNDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTNDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TTNDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GTES (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.46% price change this week, while TTNDY (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTES is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
TTNDY is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+1.67% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| GTES | TTNDY | GTES / TTNDY | |
| Capitalization | 4.61B | 20.7B | 22% |
| EBITDA | 657M | 1.73B | 38% |
| Gain YTD | -17.696 | -26.200 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.12 | 19.61 | 108% |
| Revenue | 3.57B | 13.3B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 721M | 530M | 136% |
| Total Debt | 2.56B | 3.86B | 66% |
GTES | TTNDY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTNDY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTES (74) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TTNDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTES’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTNDY (69) in the null industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTNDY’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's SMR Rating (81) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TTNDY (94) in the null industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew similarly to TTNDY’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TTNDY (87) in the null industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew similarly to TTNDY’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTNDY (85) in the null industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTNDY’s over the last 12 months.
| GTES | TTNDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DBE | 17.87 | 0.31 | +1.79% |
| Invesco DB Energy | |||
| DDWM | 36.47 | 0.36 | +1.00% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic Ccy Hdgd Intl Eq ETF | |||
| IBHI | 22.80 | 0.12 | +0.55% |
| iShares iBonds 2029 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| IBDV | 21.58 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corp ETF | |||
| YXI | 12.46 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
| ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | |||
GTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTES has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTES jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTES | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| DOV - GTES | 73% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| PH - GTES | 72% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| EMR - GTES | 72% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| FLS - GTES | 71% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ITT - GTES | 71% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
TTNDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTNDY has been loosely correlated with SDVKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTNDY jumps, then SDVKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTNDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTNDY | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| SDVKY - TTNDY | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| TKR - TTNDY | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| NDSN - TTNDY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| GTES - TTNDY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| DOV - TTNDY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||