Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$30.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.39
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GTILX (1.2B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GTILX (-17.66). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. GTILX (-10.85).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.990 | 15.011 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.66 | 5.19 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | 56.76 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.85 | 26.47 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.06 | 74.13 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement