Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$30.89
Change-$0.46 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.57
Change-$0.51 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. GTILX (1.28B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. GTILX (-13.40). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. GTILX (-6.79).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.662 | 18.293 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.40 | 13.25 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.88 | 68.35 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.79 | 34.72 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.49 | 87.25 | 66% |