Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$29.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$74.57
Change+$0.22 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. GTILX (1.23B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.61 vs. GTILX (-12.68). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. GTILX (-11.60).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.906 | 12.270 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.68 | 16.61 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.19 | 41.96 | -0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.60 | 34.72 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.26 | 70.52 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement