Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSCX
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$14.63
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. GTLSX (38.3M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTLSX (1.34) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTLSX (0.99). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. GTLSX (1.86). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.94 vs. NLSCX (15.52).
| GTLSX | NLSCX | GTLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 2.43 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.43 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.314 | 5.653 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 8.01B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 6.50 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.81 | 17.40 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.94 | 15.52 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement