Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSIX
GTLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$14.63
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GTLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. GTLSX (38.3M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTLSX (1.34) vs NLSIX (0.02). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTLSX (0.99). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSIX (1000000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. GTLSX (1.86). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.94 vs. NLSIX (22.56).
| GTLSX | NLSIX | GTLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 1.32 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.32 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.314 | 6.667 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 8.01B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.02 | 6,605% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 7.67 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.81 | 21.68 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.94 | 22.56 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement