GTMAY
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
55.37M
34 days until earnings call
IRCUF
Price
$6.24
Change
+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMAY vs IRCUF

Header iconGTMAY vs IRCUF Comparison
Open Charts GTMAY vs IRCUFBanner chart's image
Grupo TMM S.A.B
Price$1.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.37M
Irish Continental Group
Price$6.24
Change+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization1.03B
GTMAY vs IRCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMAY vs. IRCUF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMAY is a Hold and IRCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GTMAY: $1.50 vs. IRCUF: $6.24)
Brand notoriety: GTMAY and IRCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMAY: 9% vs. IRCUF: 61%
Market capitalization -- GTMAY: $55.37M vs. IRCUF: $1.03B
GTMAY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $55.37M. IRCUF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIRCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IRCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRCUF is a better buy in the long-term than GTMAY.

Price Growth

GTMAY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IRCUF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTMAY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.08% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRCUF($1.03B) has a higher market cap than GTMAY($55.4M). IRCUF has higher P/E ratio than GTMAY: IRCUF (15.10) vs GTMAY (6.95). GTMAY YTD gains are higher at: 30.435 vs. IRCUF (17.514). GTMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. IRCUF (135M). GTMAY has more cash in the bank: 264M vs. IRCUF (41.3M). IRCUF has less debt than GTMAY: IRCUF (204M) vs GTMAY (1.5B). GTMAY has higher revenues than IRCUF: GTMAY (1.9B) vs IRCUF (604M).
GTMAYIRCUFGTMAY / IRCUF
Capitalization55.4M1.03B5%
EBITDA290M135M215%
Gain YTD30.43517.514174%
P/E Ratio6.9515.1046%
Revenue1.9B604M314%
Total Cash264M41.3M639%
Total Debt1.5B204M736%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTMAY vs IRCUF: Fundamental Ratings
GTMAY
IRCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4445
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6938
SMR RATING
1..100
7849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRCUF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (54). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (69). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (78). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

GTMAY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IRCUF (46). This means that GTMAY’s stock grew similarly to IRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTMAY (100). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOF9.630.19
+2.01%
Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund
BKSE99.701.49
+1.52%
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
VIOO101.141.50
+1.51%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
PCEF19.430.15
+0.78%
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
TYO13.43-0.12
-0.91%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bear 3X ETF

GTMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMAY and KAIKY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMAY and KAIKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMAY
1D Price
Change %
GTMAY100%
N/A
KAIKY - GTMAY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPGLY - GTMAY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
IRCUF - GTMAY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICTEF - GTMAY
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
HLAGF - GTMAY
0%
Poorly correlated
-13.45%
More

IRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRCUF has been loosely correlated with SLOFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IRCUF jumps, then SLOFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCUF
1D Price
Change %
IRCUF100%
N/A
SLOFF - IRCUF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLAGF - IRCUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-13.45%
DLPTF - IRCUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMAY - IRCUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULY - IRCUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More