GTMLF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.66M
MGMNF
Price
$1.96
Change
-$0.04 (-2.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
441.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMLF vs MGMNF

Header iconGTMLF vs MGMNF Comparison
Open Charts GTMLF vs MGMNFBanner chart's image
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$81.5K
Capitalization10.66M
Magna Mining
Price$1.96
Change-$0.04 (-2.00%)
Volume$33.27K
Capitalization441.77M
GTMLF vs MGMNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMLF vs. MGMNF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMLF is a Hold and MGMNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GTMLF: $0.02 vs. MGMNF: $1.96)
Brand notoriety: GTMLF and MGMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMLF: 106% vs. MGMNF: 39%
Market capitalization -- GTMLF: $10.66M vs. MGMNF: $441.77M
GTMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.66M. MGMNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $441.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGMNF is a better buy in the long-term than GTMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTMLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGMNF is a better buy in the short-term than GTMLF.

Price Growth

GTMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.10% price change this week, while MGMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMNF($442M) has a higher market cap than GTMLF($10.7M). MGMNF YTD gains are higher at: 109.793 vs. GTMLF (-55.288). MGMNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6M vs. GTMLF (-2.01M).
GTMLFMGMNFGTMLF / MGMNF
Capitalization10.7M442M2%
EBITDA-2.01M13.6M-15%
Gain YTD-55.288109.793-50%
P/E RatioN/A90.20-
RevenueN/A22.9M-
Total CashN/A27M-
Total DebtN/A14.9M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMLFMGMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOOT170.101.92
+1.14%
Boot Barn Holdings
BK109.080.97
+0.90%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp
PXS2.90N/A
N/A
Pyxis Tankers
ALGT59.26-1.97
-3.22%
Allegiant Travel Company
SKIN1.94-0.11
-5.37%
Beauty Health Company (The)

GTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMLF and SMRVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMLF and SMRVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMLF
1D Price
Change %
GTMLF100%
-17.26%
SMRVF - GTMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRFEF - GTMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
MGMNF - GTMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
NWCBF - GTMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMNF and SLTFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMNF and SLTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMNF
1D Price
Change %
MGMNF100%
-2.35%
SLTFF - MGMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - MGMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
IONR - MGMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
GTMLF - MGMNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-17.26%
GEODF - MGMNF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
More