GTMLF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.08M
NWCBF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
128.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMLF vs NWCBF

Header iconGTMLF vs NWCBF Comparison
Open Charts GTMLF vs NWCBFBanner chart's image
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization12.08M
NEW WORLD COBALT
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$75K
Capitalization128.71M
GTMLF vs NWCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMLF vs. NWCBF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMLF is a Hold and NWCBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GTMLF: $0.02 vs. NWCBF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GTMLF and NWCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMLF: 39% vs. NWCBF: 53%
Market capitalization -- GTMLF: $12.08M vs. NWCBF: $128.71M
GTMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.08M. NWCBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $128.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTMLF and NWCBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWCBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWCBF is a better buy in the short-term than GTMLF.

Price Growth

GTMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWCBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWCBF($129M) has a higher market cap than GTMLF($12.1M). NWCBF YTD gains are higher at: 506.838 vs. GTMLF (-57.606). GTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.01M vs. NWCBF (-3.64M).
GTMLFNWCBFGTMLF / NWCBF
Capitalization12.1M129M9%
EBITDA-2.01M-3.64M55%
Gain YTD-57.606506.838-11%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMLFNWCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA338.534.44
+1.33%
Tesla
SPY649.125.38
+0.84%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL239.781.31
+0.55%
Apple
BTC.X110723.600000-999.609400
-0.89%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME22.37-0.51
-2.23%
GameStop Corp

GTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMLF and SMRVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMLF and SMRVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMLF
1D Price
Change %
GTMLF100%
N/A
SMRVF - GTMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRFEF - GTMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
MGMNF - GTMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NWCBF - GTMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCBF and PGXPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCBF and PGXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCBF
1D Price
Change %
NWCBF100%
N/A
PGXPF - NWCBF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
HANCF - NWCBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRSLF - NWCBF
10%
Poorly correlated
-12.47%
GTMLF - NWCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUEXF - NWCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
More