GTN vs PBSFY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTN is a Hold and PBSFY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBSFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PBSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GTN (@Broadcasting) experienced а +14.02% price change this week, while PBSFY (@Broadcasting) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTN is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
PBSFY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-0.60% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| GTN | PBSFY | GTN / PBSFY | |
| Capitalization | 476M | 1.47B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 1.27B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.887 | 35.607 | 104% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.14 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.64B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 135M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.69B | N/A | - |
GTN | PBSFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTN's Valuation (5) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBSFY (89) in the null industry. This means that GTN’s stock grew significantly faster than PBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
GTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as PBSFY (100) in the null industry. This means that GTN’s stock grew similarly to PBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
GTN's SMR Rating (54) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBSFY (90) in the null industry. This means that GTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
PBSFY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GTN (59) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that PBSFY’s stock grew similarly to GTN’s over the last 12 months.
PBSFY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GTN (100) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that PBSFY’s stock grew significantly faster than GTN’s over the last 12 months.
| GTN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
PBSFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBSFY and ITVPY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBSFY and ITVPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBSFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBSFY | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| ITVPY - PBSFY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXST - PBSFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| GTN - PBSFY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.76% | ||
| FUBO - PBSFY | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| THDDY - PBSFY | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||