Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTSFX vs WCMLX
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GTSFX vs WCMLX
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
Price$36.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.84M
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTSFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTSFX has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. WCMLX (42.8M). GTSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GTSFX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GTSFX (0.75). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTSFX (55.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs GTSFX (1000000). GTSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.47 vs. WCMLX (-1.30). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.74 vs. GTSFX (-15.52).
| GTSFX | WCMLX | GTSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.79 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.718 | -5.365 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 42.8M | 3,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | -1.30 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 12.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.52 | 13.74 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement