Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTSFX vs WCMLX
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GTSFX vs WCMLX
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.41 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTSFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTSFX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. WCMLX (41.3M). GTSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GTSFX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GTSFX (0.75). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTSFX (55.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs GTSFX (1000000). GTSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. GTSFX (-28.65).
| GTSFX | WCMLX | GTSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.79 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.436 | 1.788 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 41.3M | 3,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.30 | -3.04 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 21.43 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.65 | -0.83 | 3,438% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.12 | N/A | - |