Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTTMX vs JVMCX
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts GTTMX vs JVMCX
Glenmede Total Market Plus Eq Ptf
Price$19.26
Change+$0.17 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.47M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.48
Change+$0.26 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.72B
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTTMX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTTMX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. GTTMX (30.5M). GTTMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: GTTMX (0.09) vs JVMCX (0.00). GTTMX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: GTTMX (19 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). GTTMX (2.51) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.88). GTTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). GTTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: GTTMX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). GTTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.69 vs. JVMCX (-2.20). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.53 vs. GTTMX (36.68).
| GTTMX | JVMCX | GTTMX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 1.88 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.882 | 3.636 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.5M | 21.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | -2.20 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.03 | 13.62 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.68 | 54.53 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.24 | 30.79 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers