Ad is loading...
GTTMX vs JVMCX
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts GTTMX vs JVMCX
Glenmede Total Market Plus Eq Ptf
Price$16.63
Change+$0.23 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.12M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$23.15
Change+$0.34 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.24B
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTTMX vs. JVMCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTTMX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. GTTMX (27.1M). GTTMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: GTTMX (0.13) vs JVMCX (0.00). GTTMX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: GTTMX (18 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). GTTMX (2.51) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.88). GTTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). GTTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: GTTMX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). GTTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.75 vs. JVMCX (-16.45). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.52 vs. GTTMX (28.61).
| GTTMX | JVMCX | GTTMX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 1.88 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.576 | -9.842 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1M | 19.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.75 | -16.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.93 | -10.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.61 | 38.52 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.31 | 11.23 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...