Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTTMX vs JVMCX
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts GTTMX vs JVMCX
Glenmede Total Market Plus Eq Ptf
Price$20.35
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.01M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
GTTMX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTTMX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTTMX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. GTTMX (32M). GTTMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: GTTMX (0.06) vs JVMCX (0.00). GTTMX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: GTTMX (19 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). GTTMX (2.51) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). GTTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). GTTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: GTTMX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). GTTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.86 vs. JVMCX (-0.88). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. GTTMX (28.56).
| GTTMX | JVMCX | GTTMX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.85 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 1.86 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.920 | 10.711 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32M | 24B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | -0.88 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.78 | 17.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 45.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.35 | 44.40 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement