GTX
Price
$13.26
Change
-$0.51 (-3.70%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
23 days until earnings call
NKRKF
Price
$6.96
Change
-$0.25 (-3.47%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs NKRKF

Header iconGTX vs NKRKF Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs NKRKFBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$13.26
Change-$0.51 (-3.70%)
Volume$2.98M
Capitalization2.78B
Nokian Tyres
Price$6.96
Change-$0.25 (-3.47%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization1.26B
GTX vs NKRKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. NKRKF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a StrongBuy and NKRKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $13.26 vs. NKRKF: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: GTX and NKRKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 87% vs. NKRKF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.78B vs. NKRKF: $1.26B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.78B. NKRKF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNKRKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NKRKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than NKRKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while NKRKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTX($2.78B) has a higher market cap than NKRKF($1.26B). NKRKF has higher P/E ratio than GTX: NKRKF (182.18) vs GTX (9.34). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 49.320 vs. NKRKF (-9.144). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 574M vs. NKRKF (132M). GTX has more cash in the bank: 232M vs. NKRKF (125M). NKRKF has less debt than GTX: NKRKF (989M) vs GTX (1.52B). GTX has higher revenues than NKRKF: GTX (3.46B) vs NKRKF (1.34B).
GTXNKRKFGTX / NKRKF
Capitalization2.78B1.26B220%
EBITDA574M132M435%
Gain YTD49.320-9.144-539%
P/E Ratio9.34182.185%
Revenue3.46B1.34B258%
Total Cash232M125M186%
Total Debt1.52B989M154%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs NKRKF: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
NKRKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8048
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4174
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NKRKF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as GTX (30). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NKRKF (100). This means that GTX’s stock grew significantly faster than NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

NKRKF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GTX (100). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKRKF (74). This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as NKRKF (9). This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXNKRKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRUHX17.16N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Value Equity I
GMOUX32.28N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity I
PMJAX11.18N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US Small A
RGLAX27.44N/A
N/A
American Funds Global Insight R-1
WCMVX20.23N/A
N/A
WCM Focused International Equity Ins

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-3.70%
BWA - GTX
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
ALV - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
APTV - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
PHIN - GTX
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More

NKRKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKRKF and THRM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKRKF and THRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKRKF
1D Price
Change %
NKRKF100%
N/A
THRM - NKRKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
INVZ - NKRKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+14.12%
GTX - NKRKF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
WLMTF - NKRKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLLY - NKRKF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More