GTX
Price
$9.63
Change
-$0.24 (-2.43%)
Updated
Feb 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
59 days until earnings call
NKRKF
Price
$6.88
Change
-$0.62 (-8.27%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
Ad is loading...

GTX vs NKRKF

Header iconGTX vs NKRKF Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs NKRKFBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$9.63
Change-$0.24 (-2.43%)
Volume$6.66K
Capitalization2.37B
Nokian Tyres
Price$6.88
Change-$0.62 (-8.27%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization1.29B
GTX vs NKRKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. NKRKF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Hold and NKRKF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $9.88 vs. NKRKF: $6.88)
Brand notoriety: GTX and NKRKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 206% vs. NKRKF: 196%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. NKRKF: $1.29B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. NKRKF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNKRKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NKRKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than NKRKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GTX’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +7.39% price change this week, while NKRKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.41% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTX($2.37B) has a higher market cap than NKRKF($1.29B). GTX has higher P/E ratio than NKRKF: GTX (10.19) vs NKRKF (7.13). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 10.117 vs. NKRKF (-10.124). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 600M vs. NKRKF (-24M). NKRKF has more cash in the bank: 357M vs. GTX (259M). NKRKF has less debt than GTX: NKRKF (404M) vs GTX (1.69B). GTX has higher revenues than NKRKF: GTX (3.89B) vs NKRKF (1.69B).
GTXNKRKFGTX / NKRKF
Capitalization2.37B1.29B184%
EBITDA600M-24M-2,500%
Gain YTD10.117-10.124-100%
P/E Ratio10.197.13143%
Revenue3.89B1.69B230%
Total Cash259M357M73%
Total Debt1.69B404M419%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs NKRKF: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
NKRKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NKRKF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (44). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as NKRKF (100). This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

NKRKF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GTX (100). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKRKF (80). This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as NKRKF (8). This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABAEX9.040.01
+0.11%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset A
RIGCX10.85-0.04
-0.37%
Victory RS International C
FOPTX19.86-0.14
-0.70%
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps M
REPIX42.75-0.53
-1.22%
ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Inv
JLVMX20.40-0.43
-2.06%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R6

NKRKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKRKF and THRM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKRKF and THRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKRKF
1D Price
Change %
NKRKF100%
N/A
THRM - NKRKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
INVZ - NKRKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.57%
HYZN - NKRKF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTX - NKRKF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
WLMTF - NKRKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More