Ad is loading...
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$131.20
Change-$3.21 (-2.39%)
Volume$5.73K
Net Assets337.47M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$404.88
Change-$9.40 (-2.27%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets105.31B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. GVIP (337M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (5.750) vs IWF (0.822). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (8 years) vs IWF (25 years). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (14.00) vs IWF (14.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.750 | 0.822 | 700% |
| Net Assets | 337M | 105B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 120.00 | 14.00 | 857% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 0.58 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 72% Closely correlated | -8.43% | ||
| APG - GVIP | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| ET - GVIP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| WSC - GVIP | 47% Loosely correlated | -8.79% | ||
| UBER - GVIP | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||