| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 20.339 | 15.955 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 408M | 120B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.18 | 250% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 13.00 | 1,108% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.34 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSQA | 20.49 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF | |||
| TAXF | 50.55 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| American Century Divers Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| XMHQ | 99.25 | -0.22 | -0.22% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| FAAR | 30.66 | -0.19 | -0.60% |
| First Trust Alt Abs Ret Strat ETF | |||
| SSG | 8.25 | -0.46 | -5.28% |
| ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| TSM - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More | ||||