Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$139.41
Change+$0.48 (+0.35%)
Volume$1.71K
Net Assets362.74M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$445.93
Change+$3.64 (+0.82%)
Volume$915.97K
Net Assets116.57B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a StrongBuy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. GVIP (363M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (12.367) vs IWF (11.271). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 12.367 | 11.271 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 363M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 12.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.40 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | about 1 month ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 82% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 81% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
More | ||||