Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVTFX vs RMAGX
GVTFX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVTFX vs. RMAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVTFX is a Hold and RMAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVTFX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RMAGX (12.2B). RMAGX pays higher dividends than GVTFX: RMAGX (4.62) vs GVTFX (4.26). GVTFX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: GVTFX (17 years) vs RMAGX (15 years). GVTFX (0.39) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.31). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. GVTFX (50.00). GVTFX (250) and RMAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. GVTFX (7.08). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.10 vs. GVTFX (-4.91).
| GVTFX | RMAGX | GVTFX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.26 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.923 | 7.733 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 12.2B | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.26 | 4.62 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 7.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.17 | 14.11 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.91 | -1.10 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.83 | 12.84 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers