Advertisement
GWLIF vs KCLI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWLIF is a StrongBuy and KCLI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWLIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKCLI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GWLIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KCLI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWLIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCLI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GWLIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KCLI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GWLIF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while KCLI (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.18%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+1.65% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| GWLIF | KCLI | GWLIF / KCLI | |
| Capitalization | 36.5B | 341M | 10,704% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.280 | -2.645 | -691% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.56 | 5.88 | 231% |
| Revenue | 22.9B | 482M | 4,751% |
| Total Cash | 26B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.54B | 2.9M | 328,966% |
GWLIF | KCLI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GWLIF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as KCLI (45). This means that GWLIF’s stock grew similarly to KCLI’s over the last 12 months.
GWLIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KCLI (100). This means that GWLIF’s stock grew significantly faster than KCLI’s over the last 12 months.
GWLIF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as KCLI (100). This means that GWLIF’s stock grew similarly to KCLI’s over the last 12 months.
KCLI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLIF (50). This means that KCLI’s stock grew similarly to GWLIF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLIF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KCLI (62). This means that GWLIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KCLI’s over the last 12 months.
| GWLIF | KCLI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 10 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
GWLIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWLIF has been loosely correlated with PWCDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GWLIF jumps, then PWCDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWLIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWLIF | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| PWCDF - GWLIF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MFC - GWLIF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| PUK - GWLIF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| PNGAY - GWLIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CNO - GWLIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
KCLI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KCLI and FLFG have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KCLI and FLFG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KCLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCLI | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| FLFG - KCLI | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ELFIF - KCLI | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| GWLIF - KCLI | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| DLICY - KCLI | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.94% | ||
| PIAIF - KCLI | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||