GWLLF vs GWLLY
To understand the difference between Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. - Ordinary Shares - Class H (GWLLF) vs. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. - ADR (GWLLY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class H and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWLLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GWLLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GWLLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWLLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWLLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GWLLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- GWLLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while GWLLY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +5.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.52%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+3.09% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| GWLLF | GWLLY | GWLLF / GWLLY | |
| Capitalization | 28.8B | 28.8B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 7.79B | 7.79B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 43.548 | 46.250 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.71 | 12.79 | 99% |
| Revenue | 133B | 133B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 26.7B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 29.3B | N/A | - |
GWLLF | GWLLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GWLLF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLY (33). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLY’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (72). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (18). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (41). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLY (75). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLY’s over the last 12 months.
| GWLLF | GWLLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 17 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 66% |
GWLLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XPNGF - GWLLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XPEV - GWLLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
| LI - GWLLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.60% | ||
| FUJHF - GWLLF | 16% Poorly correlated | +8.45% | ||
| GNZUF - GWLLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GWLLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLY and NIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLY and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWLLY | 100% | +6.99% | ||
| NIU - GWLLY | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| CENN - GWLLY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| GNZUF - GWLLY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISUZF - GWLLY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWLLF - GWLLY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||